<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>https://dspace.sduaher.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/8345</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 01:29:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-04-04T01:29:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Comparison of Haemoglobin Estimation of Blood Donors by Specific Gravity Method, HemoCue Method and Automated Haematology Cell Analyzer</title>
      <link>https://dspace.sduaher.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/9364</link>
      <description>Title: Comparison of Haemoglobin Estimation of Blood Donors by Specific Gravity Method, HemoCue Method and Automated Haematology Cell Analyzer
Authors: Vyshnavi, V.; Mohiyuddin, S. M. Azeem;; Mohammadi, Kouser
Abstract: is fit to donate with the intention of preventing inadvertent donation from an anaemic donor. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy&#xD;
of the three common Hb estimation methods, namely, copper sulphate (CuSO4) method, HemoCue photometer and automated cell counter in&#xD;
reporting the Hb levels of blood donors. Materials and Methods: CuSo4 specific gravity method, HemoCue and automated cell analyzer (Sysmex&#xD;
XN‑550) were used to determine the Hb levels in blood samples of 500 donors. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the demographic details&#xD;
of the donor. Kappa statistics were used to determine the level of agreement between the three methods of Hb estimation. Results: HemoCue&#xD;
was found to be more sensitive (86.21%), whereas CuSo4 (97.88%) was found to be more specific. Kappa agreement was good between CuSo4&#xD;
and Sysmex XN‑550 (0.703), whereas it was moderate between HemoCue and Sysmex XN‑550 (0.458). Conclusions: The CuSO4 method is&#xD;
still viable for Hb estimation among blood donors. Thus, it can be utilised as the primary screening method; however, follow‑up testing with&#xD;
HemoCue or automated cell analyzer can be done to minimise unnecessary deferrals and false acceptance.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dspace.sduaher.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/9364</guid>
      <dc:date>2022-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comparison of Haemoglobin Estimation of Blood Donors by Specific Gravity Method, HemoCue Method and Automated Haematology Cell Analyzer</title>
      <link>https://dspace.sduaher.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/9362</link>
      <description>Title: Comparison of Haemoglobin Estimation of Blood Donors by Specific Gravity Method, HemoCue Method and Automated Haematology Cell Analyzer
Authors: Choudhari, Nikhil; Subhashish, Das; Ravi Kumar
Abstract: Introduction: Pre‑donation haemoglobin (Hb) screening is among the foremost test done on blood donors to determine whether an individual&#xD;
is fit to donate with the intention of preventing inadvertent donation from an anaemic donor. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy&#xD;
of the three common Hb estimation methods, namely, copper sulphate (CuSO4) method, HemoCue photometer and automated cell counter in&#xD;
reporting the Hb levels of blood donors. Materials and Methods: CuSo4 specific gravity method, HemoCue and automated cell analyzer (Sysmex&#xD;
XN‑550) were used to determine the Hb levels in blood samples of 500 donors. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the demographic details&#xD;
of the donor. Kappa statistics were used to determine the level of agreement between the three methods of Hb estimation. Results: HemoCue&#xD;
was found to be more sensitive (86.21%), whereas CuSo4 (97.88%) was found to be more specific. Kappa agreement was good between CuSo4&#xD;
and Sysmex XN‑550 (0.703), whereas it was moderate between HemoCue and Sysmex XN‑550 (0.458). Conclusions: The CuSO4 method is&#xD;
still viable for Hb estimation among blood donors. Thus, it can be utilised as the primary screening method; however, follow‑up testing with&#xD;
HemoCue or automated cell analyzer can be done to minimise unnecessary deferrals and false acceptance.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dspace.sduaher.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/9362</guid>
      <dc:date>2022-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comparision of Allogenic Cartilage and Autologous Cortical Bone in Ossicular Reconstruction: A Comparative Study</title>
      <link>https://dspace.sduaher.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/9047</link>
      <description>Title: Comparision of Allogenic Cartilage and Autologous Cortical Bone in Ossicular Reconstruction: A Comparative Study
Authors: K. C., Prasad; Koneru, Prathyusha; M. B., Swapanthi; P. K., Anjali; Gopi, Indu Varsha
Abstract: Ossicular discontinuity is the most common&#xD;
cause of conductive hearing loss. The use of ossicular graft&#xD;
material in ossicular chain reconstruction significantly&#xD;
improves the result in hearing. This study was conducted to&#xD;
compare and analyze the outcome of ossicular reconstruction&#xD;
using allogenic septal spur cartilage and autologous&#xD;
cortical bone in terms of hearing results and graft&#xD;
uptake rates. Study design: randomized clinical trial. Study&#xD;
included 112 patients visiting our ENT department.&#xD;
Patients between 16 and 50 years of age with history of&#xD;
chronic ear discharge and air–bone–gap (ABG) of[35 dB&#xD;
and ossicular involvement were included in the study. The&#xD;
patients underwent detailed ENT examination, audiological&#xD;
and radiological assessment of temporal bone and those&#xD;
patients with evidence of ossicular erosion were subjected&#xD;
to ossiculoplasty with allogenic septal spur cartilage (group&#xD;
I) and autologous cortical bone (group II) randomly. The&#xD;
patients were followed up to 6 months to analyze functional&#xD;
and anatomical results. 50 patients out of 56 patients&#xD;
(90%) from group I who underwent allogenic septal cartilage&#xD;
ossicular reconstruction showed significant&#xD;
improvement in hearing as assessed by pure tone audiogram&#xD;
after 3 months and 6 months. Remaining 10% of&#xD;
patients who did not show hearing improvement on PTA&#xD;
were reopened after 6 months. It was observed that the&#xD;
stapes head got necrosed in them. 40 patients (72%) out of&#xD;
56 patients (50%) from group II who underwent autologous&#xD;
cortical bone reconstruction showed hearing improvement.&#xD;
Remaining 16 patients (28%) showed no hearing&#xD;
improvement. They were reopened and ankylosis, dislocation&#xD;
of ossicle and extrusion were noted. In our study,&#xD;
graft uptake rates, formation of retraction pockets, and&#xD;
hearing improvements were analyzed. Complications like&#xD;
ankylosis formation, dislocation of ossicle and extrusion&#xD;
rates were more in the group II compared to group I.&#xD;
Hearing results of group I are better compared to group II&#xD;
and the allogenic septal cartilage being readily available is&#xD;
a good option for ossicular reconstruction.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dspace.sduaher.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/9047</guid>
      <dc:date>2022-08-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Decision making for treatment of chylous firstula following neck surgery: A challenge to the Surgeon.</title>
      <link>https://dspace.sduaher.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/9007</link>
      <description>Title: Decision making for treatment of chylous firstula following neck surgery: A challenge to the Surgeon.
Authors: Gupta, Arjun; Azeem Mohiyuddin, S.M.; Mohammadi, A Kouser; Babu, Prashanth; N, Harshitha; Thakur., Kunal
Abstract: Chylous Fistula following neck surgery is an uncommon but challenging complication encountered by head and neck surgeons. This leads to skin flap necrosis, infection, vascular blow outs and chylothorax. Co-morbidities like malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, radiated neck predispose to chylous fistula. The common site of leak is thoracic duct or lower jugular lymphatics. Identification of chyle leak intra-operatively can be difficult. Chyle leaks more than 500ml/day are termed high output leaks and require re-exploration of the wound and ligation of injured lymphatic duct. Low output leaks settle down with conservative treatment like high protein and low fat naso-gastric feeds, dependent drain, aspiration of collected chyle, antibiotics and octreotide, a somatostatin derivative. Chyle leaks less than 500ml/day and more than 200ml/day are a dilemma in deciding the treatment modality. Chylous fistula not responding to conservative treatment can cause life threatening complications and contaminate or macerate the neck making re-exploration at a later stage difficult. The decision to abandon conservative treatment and the ideal time for it is controversial. We are presenting our experience with the outcome of post-operative chylous fistula in a series of 11 under-nourished patients following neck dissection for malignancies, cystic hygroma and traumatic, contaminated neck injuries. All these patients developed left sided chylous fistula measuring 300ml to 400ml/day, 2 to 4 days after surgery. They were successfully managed by re-exploration of neck and ligation of injured lymphatic duct after 3 to 5 days trial of conservative management. There were no major complications or delay in adjuvant treatment</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2021 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dspace.sduaher.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/9007</guid>
      <dc:date>2021-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

